On The Border Margarita Bucket Or Big Bucket

INCOME ON-LINE: ROMANO INVESTIGATED FOR VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE REASONS OF PRIVACY

After spreading on the net income of 2005, the Director of Revenue, Massimo Romano, was written under investigation by the prosecution to Rome with the idea of \u200b\u200bthe crime of violation of Article 167 of the privacy laws. In particular, it relates to Article 17 of the Act on Processing of data other than sensitive and judicial presenting specific risks to the rights and fundamental freedoms so as to take measures and precautions to ensure the person concerned. As well as recorded in the register of suspects, the Inland Revenue has received, respectively, is a deduncia Codacons is a penalty by the Guarantor of privacy Francesco Pizzetti.

Termination of Codacons consists of compensation, from the association of taxpayers, 20 billion euro. On the other hand, the guarantor of privacy stated that it will apply a penalty of up to € 18 thousand for non-correct information to taxpayers on how the data on the income of 2005 (the taxpayers were informed by the laws of 1973 which does not include the mode 'on-line dissemination of data)

Granola Recipe -whey -brown -honey

STOP THE GUARANTOR

These are the reasons for which the guarantor of privacy has ceased the distribution of income on-line:

- Unlawful 'online mode used by the Treasury to distribute the income of an Italian director of the Revenue it is only a way to fix annually the arrangements for establishing the lists of statements income, but not the manner of their publication, which remain the prerogative of the Legislature.

- No protection for the data provided in Online around the world has been able to access data, downloaded, modified, distributed and even sell them. Once put into the data network carrying the expansion of this escape an unlimited period of time and not a single year, as required by law.

- Lack of information to taxpayers on how the data: the Agency had given a general statement in the 2005 tax return. In fact, we used a different system than that provided by the regulations as anticipated; inlotre "When you use the digital administration - highlights the Guarantor - you need to find technical solutions."

Mark Yusko Endowment Fund

TAX RETURNS: THE QUESTION OF TRANSPARENCY E. ..

The Agency Revenue has made available on the web for a few hours before the crash by the Guarantor, the income for the year 2005 declared by all Italian citizens. Not only is the site of the Agency has given the possibility 'of a free consultation but also to save a copy with file transfer functions according to the following location: www.agenziaentrate.gov.it -> People Offices in office -> lists of names of taxpayers -> inquiry statements -> Province of interest -> Town of interest.

As quoted by Corriere della Sera, the measure is signed by Massimo Romano, director of the Revenue, which was issued in 99 a similar measure to implement the rule of 'transparency', that 'the possibility' of full flow of information in the public interest. The purpose of this act had to be the fight against tax evasion and financial crime. Despite pre

'with online publication regulation introduced under the code of the digital launched in 2005 that has to ensure the availability of information in digital mode using, in the most appropriate technologies' information and communication, there were obvious and significant problems of compliance with the legal framework regarding privacy, due its omission of the 'mode' appropriate '.

Hence the block party by the Guarantor to privacy, more 'than legitimate, based on paragraph 6 of Article 60 of Presidential Decree 600/1973, where it is expected that the lists are stored for a year for the purpose of consultaizone anyone, either in the same tax office, both at the Commons, then on the internet with no consultation "unlimited" or at least without "mode 'appropriate'.


... FEARS FOR ITALIANS

"As easy as stealing candy from a baby," the opportunity 'to access not only to the aforementioned registers and their personal data, but the opportunity 'to find them through a system of file sharing sites and peer-to-peer, has knocked the Italian citizens, despite the stop of the Guarantor. This act and

'was defined by the Association for consumers, as "nuisance tax" means a breach of privacy law "196/2003" and, with the publication of sensitive data on income, increase in criminal purposes. Also according to consumer groups, the concerns mentioned above, citizens may demand compensation up to € 1000 for the publication of tax information, it says the president Carlo Pileri "In the declaration forms income is not provided for either a question about the publication of such data or a specific clause authorizing the publication which is another violation of the law itself. " Countercurrent and 'instead Sos Users Association, asking to re-publish the lists of taxpayers as a result of its possibility' of complete transparency.



PRIVACY ABROAD (source, "Corriere della Sera")

In Britain, the statements are covered by the right to privacy. No one can therefore, much less over the Internet, access to private files without a release. They obviously excluded accountants, who work delegated to its clients, and tax officials. The only case in which the tax information of individual citizens may become public domain is unfolded when, at the request of a judge, in a process that takes place in open court. The employees of HM Revenue & Customs, the British tax office, they may under no circumstances give access to members of the public, including journalists, or risk losing their jobs.